A story in the Guardian states; “Robert W Trogdon, a leading scholar of 20th-century American literature, told the Guardian that Hemingway’s novels and short stories were crying out for editions that are “as accurate to what he wrote as possible” because the number of mistakes “ranges in the hundreds.” Although many are slight, he said, they were nevertheless mistakes, made primarily by editors and typesetters.”
Wow, I thought it was just me that had errors caused by
me others. Yes, the dreaded editors or proof readers who are fixing your wonderful manuscript, but somehow manage to make it worse. Okay, I can hear my editors screaming obscenities from many miles away. Sure some of those elusive “mistakes” were mine, but weren’t you hired to fix that?
Hemingway probably had a much better set of excuses than I do—some of his manuscripts were hand written. My god, if I actually “wrote” these stories in long-hand it would take a magician to fix them to the point they would be readable. Plus, there was another step in Hemingway’s world where the manuscripts were typeset. Many years in my past, I was in the printing business, and those typesetting machines were like very bad old typewriters—of course there would be mistakes!
I like the line “made primarily by editors and typesetters.” Mr. Trogdon probably has some natural bias about saying Hemingway was a sloppy writer (I understand he used to drink—a lot!) It’s a lot more convenient to place blame on nameless, faceless editors.
In one of my past blogs I talked about Tolstoy (I do this quite often so I can run his picture with the blog—the poor man looks insane), and the fact that War and Peace was 1,225 pages long, and he did write in long-hand. What’s amazing is that I read somewhere it was actually almost twice that long, but was cut down to keep it at one book. A book that size might be pushing 400,000 words; I’m exhausted after writing a 70,000-word book. This may get back to his state of mine, and why he looks the way he does in that photo.
Errors have been on my mine lately. Amazon does quality checks on some e-books by running them through what appears to be very sophisticated software to find grammar/typo errors. This is not Word checking grammar and typos, because it catches things that are not obvious. A couple of my books had some errors—about 7 was average on each book. That is after three (yes, three!) editors had reviewed the books. Those 7 errors were mostly typos and a couple were not mistakes at all because it was a syntax I was using to fit a character. Still I get this rather unfriendly notice that I should fix the errors or Amazon would label my book as flawed. I assumed the next step was to attach a Tolstoy pic to my bio.
After a moment of irritation, I realized Amazon just did me a favor, at no cost. The errors were easy to fix and a new file was uploaded and cleared Amazon’s approval process. I’m just not sure that Amazon should be the standard setter for all things, but I guess if nobody else is willing to do it why not them?
So I had a 70,000-word mystery book that is often free, and it had 7 errors; and I felt bad. As if I had not provided perfection at zero cost to my reader. I’m starting to seriously wonder why I write these things? Maybe it is punishment for some of my sins in grade-school. I was primarily an artist in grade-school and had bad penmanship, plus it was on my permanent record. I knew that would catch up with me sooner or later.
Adding new art to my site almost everyday. These are things I’ve done over many years. Take a look www.tedcliftonart.com.
Just like Hemingway, I also enjoyed a nip or two on occasion, which might explain some of these images.