Been thinking maybe I should add a language warning to the descriptions of my books. Some reviewers don’t like the foul language and have given me bad reviews for just my choice of words.
blasphemous or obscene language.
“an outburst of profanity”
synonyms: oath · swear word · expletive · curse · obscenity · four-letter word · dirty word · execration · imprecation · blasphemy · swearing · foul language · bad language · cursing · cuss · cuss word
My books contain gritty language or even profanity. Gritty is not meaningful enough and profanity is too harsh. Maybe I mean cuss words or foul language; but it’s not blasphemy, or is it? How about imprecation?
a spoken curse.
“she hurled her imprecations at anyone who might be listening”
I’m fairly sure I have never used the word imprecation in any context. Maybe I should add a warning to my books “IMPRECATION WARNING!” Probably not helpful? Malediction? Anathema? Strong language might work, although it sounds rather like a grandmotherly warning; now, now you better watch that strong language!
Banned words would have had meaning at one time. Banned words were usually from books; but today I’m not sure there are banned words. TV might have been a standard for language but that also is gone. Now it is shocking to watch a cable show and not have a few fucks tossed in.
I had one reviewer write that I was part of the society wide problem of low morals. As far as I could tell this had nothing to do with my morals only my language. This person was applying the standards of past generations to today’s society. This is a problem for all of us; social norms or standards change. The change is usually perceived by the young as good and bad by the older members. In many ways the bad is as much about change as it is about what has changed.
My father swore. His swear words were mostly “colorful.” There was no question he was swearing but the actual meaning was not so clear. Knucklehead was a favorite. Bump on a log or peckerwood were used as swear words but only in the context of they were not said in “mixed company.” My father used damn and hell, but most of his obscenities were descriptive of people. He was from a southern rural background and racism was always close to the surface. And yet, he was religious and considered to be a pillar of his community. He would be shocked at the language in my books. Sorry, dad, it just slipped out.
Language tells us a lot about ourselves, our society and where we fit in the world. I use language in my books as a way to convey an understanding of the characters, stress they’re experiencing, energy level in the story, fear, all sorts of emotions. Having someone scream, SHIT! tells us a lot about what is going on with that character. Some writers would use a different way to convey the frustration or anger of the character; but I often use these “dirty words” to convey those emotions quickly and, hopefully, meaningfully.
My books tend to be an odd mixture of hard-boiled and cozy mysteries. This is not by accident. I liked both of those genres and made the decision that what I wanted in a book was a little bit of both. This probably confuses some readers and makes some mad, because it is not either pure cozy or hard-boiled. I’m going to work on better descriptions so readers are not surprised by the books and will take them at face value and have fun reading.
Conspiracy theories exist because the human brain wants to connect the dots. The brain seeks patterns in all things to avoid danger and be more effective at finding food. Nice, simple and close to the truth. Patterns have been shown to control much of our brain function. The details get a little fuzzy to me but can be found with an internet search.
Writers layout stories that allow us to connect the dots. It’s one of the reason fictional stories have such power, they fit into one of the brains key functions of finding patterns. When we read a mystery story (or watch a movie or TV show), it allows us to perform this key brain function without physical risk, and it gives us pleasure.
People who readily believe conspiracy theories are prone to finding patterns in almost everything. And based on some things I have read, it appears that it becomes a habit. The more patterns you see, the more likely you are to see patterns.
The counter to pattern seeking and conspiracy believing is critical thinking.
“What is critical thinking? Critical thinking refers to the ability to analyze information objectively and make a reasoned judgment. It involves the evaluation of sources, such as data, facts, observable phenomena, and research findings.
Good critical thinkers can draw reasonable conclusions from a set of information and discriminate between useful and less useful details to solve problems or make decisions.” thoughtco.com
One of the buzz words in public education for a long time was to teach critical thinking. This is a life-long skill that can be taught and leads to inquisitive students who don’t accept truth as a given. Public education leaders soon discovered while having critical thinking skills was an admirable goal in practice, it was a pain in the butt to implement. There is still some lip service to this goal, but it is a lot easier to just have kids shut-up and believe what they are told. Plus, most parents really don’t want critical thinking kids; they want their kids to believe the same conspiracy theories they do. Without critical thinking the more the pattern seeking brain believes conspiracy theories. It becomes a family tradition.
This whole post feels like a conspiracy; but I have no idea what the dots connect. Maybe I can explain that next week.